Today: Fri 3 Sep 2010
Printer Friendly
A A A

GPs push AMA to take hard line on health reforms

31st May 2010
Caroline Brettingham-Moore   all articles by this author
1 comment

The AMA federal council will be scrutinising voluntary patient enrolment, fundholding and pay for performance after delegates at the association’s National Conference supported two urgent motions on Saturday.

Introducing his motion on Friday, Queensland GP Dr Shaun Rudd called on the AMA to condemn “attempts to procure voluntary registration and wholesale doctor patient fund-holding as unwarranted bureaucracy and a hazard to quality care”.

 “The most important thing to me is an autonomous doctor patient relationship,” he said. “It [voluntary patient enrolment] is the worst thing that could happen to general practice.”

Dr Rudd took aim at the new diabetes scheme, which he argued went “straight through the heart of autonomous practice”.

Last month MO reported that only 13% of GPs felt that the new diabetes model would improve patient care. Among concerns expressed by GPs were that the new scheme would undermine the fee-for-service model and reduce GP choice for patients.

South Melbourne GP Dr Tony Bartone also found support among delegates for his urgent motion that called on the federal council to “urgently review the AMA’s efforts to address the threats posed to general practice”.

He called on the council to mount a public campaign in the lead-up to the next election to combat reforms that “significantly threaten” the doctor-patient relationship.

Both motions were voted through by delegates and will now be considered by the federal council.

Tags: voluntary patient enrolment, AMA Federal Council, pay for performance, diabetes scheme, Dr Shaun Rudd

Share: submit to reddit


khanGP
31st May 2010
4:39pm
I place the blame, fully & squarely on to the AGPN & the local Divisions of General Practice. They do not represent the Voice of the G.P. at all. They purport to do so, but they absolutely do not represent the Voice of the G.P. Each local Division is simply an extended arm of the Govt. - I challenge each Member of each Division, to soul-search their Conscience - each Member is aiding & abetting the Govt. in its sinister Schemes, by not standing up. After being a Director of my local Division for a couple of years, I resigned, as my Conscience would not permit me to be a part ( albeit, a small part ) of the ongoing destruction of General Practice. Being one of the providers of ongoing Post-Graduate Educational Activities, is all the Divisions are worth. General Practitioners will find enough ways to replace the Divisions, as have the disbanded Western Sydney Division Members so successfully done so. The Divisions are most definitely not Champions of General Practitioners - they are the Tools by which the Govt. continues to claim that they have the full support of the GPs.- they equate the Local Divisions as the Voice of the GPs, which it is not.
To make a comment, please update your profile to include a nickname