POLL: Most GPs will snub diabetes scheme
|
GPs are set to reject the Rudd Government’s contentious plan to overhaul the management of patients with diabetes.
A Medical Observer poll has revealed that just one in five GPs plans to adopt the new model, which is set to begin in 2012.
Under the controversial $436 million scheme, practices will receive block-funding worth up to $1200 for each patient they enrol, plus annual payments worth an average of $10,800, which will be based, in part, on GPs’ performance in keeping patients healthy and out of hospital.
Additional upfront payments of $1500 per practice were also offered to sweeten the deal.
Announcing the scheme earlier this month, Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon anticipated 60% of practices would sign up within the first year.
But the MO poll casts doubt on this prediction, showing that nearly 80% of GPs remain unconvinced of the worth of the new scheme.
The national poll of 154 GPs, conducted by Cegedim Strategic Data, also revealed that 53% did not believe the new model would offer any improvement on existing diabetes care plans and team care arrangements.
Victorian GP Dr Simon Pilbrow said the model would create an unfair two-tier health system for patients, with the cost and level of care provided dependent upon the willingness of practices to adopt the scheme.
“Diabetic patients might get quite militant if practices don’t go for it… [while] every other patient who doesn’t have diabetes will wish they had it because they can get free treatment,” Dr Pilbrow said.
“We have bent over backwards to manage our diabetic patients and get their [HbA1c levels] down and manage the full gamut of their conditions – but there are enough incentives for us to get that job done already, quite apart from wanting our patients to be well.”
The poll also revealed that 71% of GPs felt the funding model would penalise practices whose patients did not follow GP advice, while two-thirds believed it would create perverse incentives for GPs to focus on less complex patients.
Other concerns included an undermining of the fee-for-service model and a reduction in GP choice for patients.
AMA vice-president Dr Steve Hambleton said the lack of GP support for the plan showed the Government needed to rework the funding elements in order for its implementation to be successful.
“Everybody welcomes the dollars but… GPs are saying they don’t agree with it and don’t see the benefit – so we have got to drive [toward] something that will provide that,” Dr Hambleton said.
Professor Michael Kidd, executive dean of Flinders University’s faculty of health sciences, SA, said while there was international evidence to support pay-for-performance models of care, the Government needed to work harder to convince GPs of the plan’s worth.
Acceptance of this model of care

This poll was conducted for Medical Observer by Cegedim Strategic Data research company.


